On the same day it became public knowledge that Germany has a messed-up energy policy and will become a net grain importer because of a poor grain harvest, the world's largest chemical company, BASF in Ludwigshafen, announced two far-reaching decisions: namely, that research on green genetic engineering in Germany would be relocated to the U.S. and – what is often overlooked – the company will cease pursuing any projects for the German or European market. The move, it said, was a reaction to the lack of acceptance of agricultural biotechnology in many parts of Europe.

The bombshell announced the end of a process in plant breeding that had been insidiously developing for some years. The signal is clear: the research goes on, just not here in Germany and not for us. Plant research at universities and other public institutions has changed: the scientists involved have either turned to less contentious areas or they have emigrated, predominantly to the Anglo-Saxon countries. These decisions derive from the prevailing climate of opinion in our country and are only too easy to understand: panic and prejudice here nip in the bud any rational debate about the pros and cons of green genetic engineering (GM crops and foods). While doomsayers like Percy Schmeisser, Vendana Shiva and, more recently, a certain Don Huber, tour through the German countryside and rip off a credulous public with abstruse theories about the supposedly monstrous dangers of biotechnology, scientists have to spend their time defending reality from crazy conspiracy theorists from obscure 'project workshops’. Destruction of field trials, including using serious violence against guards hired to protect those approved trials from vandalism, is also on the agenda (that is, if the same eco-terrorists are not too busy destroying the rail tracks which serve to take nuclear waste to the designated storage plant in the Wendland [1]).

Those actually responsible for this policy shamefully cower in terror before the green zeitgeist and let research take the strain. The public is more concerned with the alleged misconduct of the Federal President, whose behaviour is hardly different from the other 95% of bargain hunters in our society. They ignore the fact that we are skating on very thin ice: we in Europe are stuck because of our immense national debts – for which the give-away policies of recent decades are especially responsible – and not only with respect to the massive crisis in our financial systems: we are totally unprepared to deal with the emerging global problems of climate change, global population growth and energy shortages.

To solve these problems, we need strong agricultural research, in all areas and at all levels. This is especially true for issues for which conventional plant breeding offers no readily accessible solutions; that is where we need genetic engineering, both in the private and public sectors. In the longer term our crops are unreliable: they are not adapted to the long, dry or hot periods to be expected in future in our region. The bad red-green (2) decisions promoting a biogas boom and cultivation of plants for “bio-fuel" have exacerbated the situation because their clean energy balances are rather negative, with unpredictable consequences for the climate. So what happens instead? The public is lulled by promises of an allegedly ecological organic agriculture which is based on erroneous calculations while it is increasingly clear that such products are no better, or even safer, than conventional agriculture. And their production demands much more land than we actually have at our disposal.

Conclusion: Only after the last fertilizer plant has closed and the last farm has been forcibly converted to "organic", will you notice that hunger is not fun. But by then Jürgen Trittin (3) will be comfortably settled Tuscany and Claudia Roth (4) will have returned to her home planet.

Prof. Dr. Hans-Jörg Jacobsen is a professor of molecular genetics at the Institute of Plant Genetics at the Leibniz University of Hanover. He publishes regularly in NovoArgumente.

1. Gorleben in the Wendland is the site of a nuclear waste storage facility in eastern Lower Saxony.
2. Refers to the left-green political alliances in German politics.
3.
A German Green politician. He was Federal Minister for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety from 1998 to 2005.
4. Claudia Benedikta Roth is a Green Party politician in Germany and erstwhile press spokesperson for the Greens in the Bundestag.

Source:

Hans-Jörg Jacobsen (18.01.2012). BASF und Gentechnik: Nix wie weg! Novo Argumente (http://www.novo-argumente.com/magazin.php/novo_notizen/artikel/0001048)

Translated from the original and reproduced here with the permission of the author.


<<<back

xxxx
xxxx
 
  BASF and gene technology: up, up – and away